Migration review

Request a migration review before rebuilding your site

Send your current website details so we can review whether moving from Webflow or WordPress to Astro makes sense, what could break in SEO, CMS, forms, tracking, redirects, and how to phase the move safely.

If the right next step is to stay on the current platform, clean up first, or move in phases, we will say that plainly.

Audience

Who should request a migration review

Use this when the move to Astro needs a practical scope check before anything changes.

01 Webflow or WordPress migrations

Use this when your current platform is limiting performance, SEO, editing, or long term control.

02 SEO sensitive rebuilds

Use this when URLs, metadata, redirects, forms, tracking, and indexed pages need to be protected.

03 CMS or content heavy sites

Use this when content, collections, blog posts, service pages, or landing pages need to move cleanly.

Review scope

What the migration review checks before a Webflow or WordPress to Astro rebuild

A short checklist of the current site areas that shape the migration decision.

  • Current site structure
  • Source platform and CMS
  • CMS/content complexity
  • Redirect and SEO risk
  • Metadata, canonicals, and sitemap
  • Forms, analytics, and tracking
  • Performance opportunities
  • Launch scope and migration phases

Request migration review

Share your current site and migration context. We will review scope, SEO risk, CMS/content needs, and whether Astro is the right move.

We review the site structure, SEO risk, CMS/content needs, and migration scope before giving a response.

A current URL and a few details are enough for the first review.

Scope

What you get back from the migration review

A concise readout of the recommendation and the migration notes that shape the next step.

Decision output

  • Migration recommendation
  • SEO risk notes

Delivery notes

  • CMS and content notes
  • Launch and scope notes

Next step

  • Migrate now, stay put, or phase the move
  • Suggested project path
Overview

What happens after you request a migration review

01

Review the current site

We check the live pages, source platform, templates, CMS/content shape, and visible migration risk.

02

Map the migration risk

We look at redirects, metadata, canonicals, forms, tracking, and crawl signals that should not break during the move.

03

Send a practical next step

You get a scoped recommendation: migrate now, stay on the current setup for now, or start with a smaller phased migration.

FAQ

Questions before requesting a migration review

Quick answers before you submit the request.

Can you review a Webflow or WordPress site before migration?

Yes. The review can check Webflow, WordPress, custom, and content-heavy sites before deciding whether an Astro rebuild makes sense.

Will the migration review include SEO redirects and metadata?

Yes. The review checks URL risk, redirects, titles, descriptions, canonicals, sitemap behavior, and indexed page protection.

Can you check CMS content, forms, and tracking?

Yes. The review includes CMS/content structure, forms, analytics, tracking scripts, and launch risk where they affect the migration scope.

Do you recommend staying on the current platform if migration is risky?

Yes. If moving immediately would create unnecessary SEO, CMS, or launch risk, the recommendation can be to stay, clean up first, or move in phases.

What happens after I submit the request?

Agnite Studio reviews the current site, maps visible migration risks, and replies with next steps, questions, or a rough project scope.